GTX 1650 SUPER vs RX 580 Test in 9 Games

are your testing done open air? or in case with the usual fans (exhaust on top and intake on front) just curious -Thanks!

Author — Reeeformat

Reply

One fact, Ubisoft and Amd getting a partnership to optimalize the newer Ubisoft games to AMD hardwares, now the GTX 1650 hase more FPS than Rx 580. Because the AC Odyssey is a DirektX 11 game and the NVidia gpu s is strong for dx11, and the AMD gpu s is have asyncron architecture, this is a function to the GPU to render more object same time, this is help to Dx 12 and Vulcan. But the Dx 12 game list is very sort. In future, the Dx 12 gpu s getting more better because is sharped for this, not to Dx 11. (I know, the GTX 1650 super have asyncron architecture, but the AMD getting this work better. And, if you have more money, then buy a GTX 1660 Ti)

Author — DDavid

Reply

Although the 1650s is nice, it’s cool to see a card that’s like 3 years old that could compete with a newer card. But 1650s is better since it saves more power and nvidia will probably release better drivers for it :/

Author — Kaindra Djoemena

Reply

They beat each other here and there. Even though Nvidia won in most, Amd is a better choice if you want a future proof gpu bcs of double the vram

Author — Arch

Reply

Less bucks, less heat, less power About 10fps difference at average 60fps (ngelectable). I love my 1650s

Author — Disward Exia

Reply

So basically, the 580 has 4GB more VRAM, the 1650S packs NVENC and CUDA. Performance is roughly the same, so the choice rests on whether you *need* CUDA and a discrete encoder, or you need more VRAM.

Author — BRC_Del

Reply